CO129-233 - Acting Governor Cameron - 1887 [6-8] — Page 224

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

existence between England and

blima

would respectfully urge

what if them

1.

Cany

extradition

this colony to blijne which is

14. 12

from

extremely doubtful the whole of the

+

law that governs it is contained

in

the two Chongthong Ordinances above

referred to 2 of 1850 and 2 of 1871.

*

but before asking His Excellency, to

read these Ordinances in

the only way

they

can

be construed

we

would ask him to

call attention to the

case referred to by the Wodehouse when

giving his decision and

Levey a For to Sad we

committing

the

case of the Attorney General doughty & Kwok a ding which

219

was decided in the Privy Council

on

appeal from the Supreme Court of this colony. In so far as this

case concerns

we

would

respectfully submit that the only point decided

by the Privy Council in that case

was

that the British authorities could

not claim rendition

of

persons accused

of an offence

(piracy jure gentium)

not triable

within

the jurisdiction

of

that was

punishable

under

our law

16

within

Edit History

2026-05-25 17:52:25 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
existence between England and blima would respectfully urge what if them 1. Cany extradition this colony to blijne which is 14. 12 from extremely doubtful the whole of the + law that governs it is contained in the two Chongthong Ordinances above referred to 2 of 1850 and 2 of 1871. * but before asking His Excellency, to read these Ordinances in the only way they can be construed we would ask him to call attention to the case referred to by the Wodehouse when giving his decision and Levey a For to Sad we committing the case of the Attorney General doughty & Kwok a ding which 219 was decided in the Privy Council on appeal from the Supreme Court of this colony. In so far as this case concerns we would respectfully submit that the only point decided by the Privy Council in that case was that the British authorities could not claim rendition of persons accused of an offence (piracy jure gentium) not triable within the jurisdiction of that was punishable under our law 16 within
Baseline (Original)
existance between England and blima would respectfully urge what if them 1. Cany extradition this bolony to blijne which is 14. 12 from extrendly doubtful the whole of the + love that governe, it is containe in the two Chongthong Ordimaves above referred to 2 of 1850 and 2 of 1871. * but before acking His Excellency, to read these Ordinomes in the only way they e an const med alloo cuse wo ве VOL Wh the way and Juturit in which properly read and would ask him to to call attention to the referred to by the. Wodehoeve when giving his decision and ! Levey a For to Sad we committing the of case of the Attorney Gencial doughtong & Kwok a ding which 219 was decided in the Privy Council f 4 N appeal from the Experene baut this bolony. Its far as this cowcem d we would Case to "Prespectfully embrit that the only point decided by the Privy Council in that case Avi that the blimese authorities could not claim to rendition * they accused privacy. of (firacy jure gentum) air offence triable مة 02- perom the high sens that was punishable guziy 16 within
2026-05-25 17:52:25 · Baseline
View content

existance between England and

blima

would respectfully urge

what if them

1.

Cany

extradition

this bolony to blijne which is

14. 12

from

extrendly doubtful the whole of the

+

love that governe, it is containe

in

the two Chongthong Ordimaves above

referred to 2 of 1850 and 2 of 1871.

*

but before acking His Excellency, to

read these Ordinomes in

the only way

they

e an

const med

alloo

cuse

wo

ве

VOL

Wh

the

way

and

Juturit in which

properly read and

would ask him to

to call attention to the

referred to by the. Wodehoeve when

giving his decision and

!

Levey a For to Sad we

committing

the

of

case of the Attorney Gencial doughtong & Kwok a ding which

219

was decided in the Privy Council

f

4

N

appeal from the Experene baut this bolony. Its far as this

cowcem d

we

would

Case to

"Prespectfully

embrit that the only point decided

by the Privy Council in that case

Avi

that the blimese authorities could

not claim to rendition

*

they accused

privacy.

of

(firacy jure gentum)

air offence

triable

مة

02-

perom

the high sens

that was

punishable

guziy

16

within

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.